Difference between revisions of "Ci talk:1009575418"

From Wenlin Dictionaries
(Created page with "==品: Noun or bound form?== With the meaning 'fret' it appears to be a noun; with the other meanings glossed as nouns it appears to be a bound form (b.f.)... ~~~~")
 
(品: Noun or bound form?)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
With the meaning 'fret' it appears to be a noun; with the other meanings glossed as nouns it appears to be a bound form (b.f.)... [[User:Tangmu|Tāngmǔ 汤姆]] ([[User talk:Tangmu|talk]]) 12:38, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 
With the meaning 'fret' it appears to be a noun; with the other meanings glossed as nouns it appears to be a bound form (b.f.)... [[User:Tangmu|Tāngmǔ 汤姆]] ([[User talk:Tangmu|talk]]) 12:38, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 +
 +
By the way, ideally each b.f. gloss ("df" band) should be followed by an example ("in" band). Currently we lack an example for 'fret', but that will be OK if we make that a noun. And we lack an example for "chapter/section of Budd. scripture". Would 观音普门品 be suitable? How about 小品般若波羅蜜經 if we make an entry for it? [[User:Tangmu|Tāngmǔ 汤姆]] ([[User talk:Tangmu|talk]]) 13:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:27, 10 April 2018

品: Noun or bound form?

With the meaning 'fret' it appears to be a noun; with the other meanings glossed as nouns it appears to be a bound form (b.f.)... Tāngmǔ 汤姆 (talk) 12:38, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

By the way, ideally each b.f. gloss ("df" band) should be followed by an example ("in" band). Currently we lack an example for 'fret', but that will be OK if we make that a noun. And we lack an example for "chapter/section of Budd. scripture". Would 观音普门品 be suitable? How about 小品般若波羅蜜經 if we make an entry for it? Tāngmǔ 汤姆 (talk) 13:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)